Genachowski’s Spectrum Plan: Who Owns the Airwaves?

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski wants to auction part of the spectrum reserved for over-the-air TV broadcasts to create new bandwidth for mobile data. This raises the interesting question of just who owns those airwaves.

As a legal matter, the answer is clear. The Radio Act of 1927 made it clear that the government allowed the private owners of radio stations to operate on public airwaves to serve “the public convenience and necessity.” This notion of public trusteeship was written into the Communications Act of 1934 and was extended to TV stations when they were given–not sold–their operating licenses.

As a practical and political manner things are much more complicated. The recent history starts in 1996, when the Telecommunications Act mandated a transition from analog to digital TV broadcasting. Existing stations were assigned new spectrum for digital channels and the existing channels were to be surrendered back to the government for reuse. After many delays, this transition was finally completed last year. Broadcast stations returned their analog spectrum in the 700 MHz band to the government (most of which was auctioned off last year for wireless service) and kept their new spectrum.

A total of 300 MHz is allocated to TV, but according to Genachowski, in small markets only about 36 MHz of this is actually used, while even in the largest markets usage taps out at 150 MHz. Some of this is so-called “white space,” the spectrum between assigned channels. Some of it is spectrum assigned to licensees but either left unused or used for low-value purposes such as continuous radar displays, a very  popular use for local broadcasters’ second and third digital channels.

One weird consequence of Genachowski’s proposed Mobile Future Auction is that the broadcasters who agree to give up some bandwidth will end up being paid for spectrum they do not, and never have, owned. But doing so is probably a political necessity for anything to happen. The National Assn. of Broadcasters has argued for years that very few owners of broadcast properties are the original licensees and that  subsequent owners of the stations paid for the spectrum in their purchases.

Whatever you think of that argument, and I must say I find it deeply unconvincing,  the fact is that local broadcasters carry a tremendous amount of clout on Capitol Hill. The long fight over the digital transition, which ended only because Congress finally decided it needed the money from spectrum auctions worse than it needed the goodwill of broadcasters, showed that major concessions are needed if this spectrum is to be freed any time in the next couple of decades.

Personally, I view the spectrum allocated to broadcast TV as mostly a waste of perfectly good bandwidth. Americans overwhelmingly get their broadcast TV from cable or satellite, not over the air. But the reality is that broadcasters are going to have to be bribed even to part with spectrum they are not using for much of anything, if at all. That means Genachowski’s proposal, imperfect as it is, may be the best we can reasonably hope for.

3 Responses to “Genachowski’s Spectrum Plan: Who Owns the Airwaves?”

  1. Theo Francis Says:

    Most Americans do get their television from cable or satellite; but a fairly large number don’t; arguably, those who can’t afford cable or satellite TV are far more reliant on broadcast than those with cable/satellite are on those service. (For one thing, I would bet that more cable/satellite subscribers also have ready access to the Internet in their home, while more broadcast-dependent TV viewers don’t.). One legitimate question is whether a public resource should be managed for the majority, or those most reliant on it. (To take just one example: Most people don’t fly much, but I suspect it’s a fairly safe argument that airports, air traffic, etc., are largely managed for those who do fly.) But that doesn’t undermine your broader point.

  2. Rich Repplier Says:

    It appears that it’s eventually going to come down to a struggle between the broadcasters and the mobile interests (both cellular providers and hardware manufacturers). The broadcasters may have been dominant in the past, but their power is slowly waning with the proliferation of many other methods of obtaining entertainment. As smartphones expand their popularity, the demand for spectrum space will rapidly increase, and at some point (perhaps not too far in the future) the demand will exceed the space allocated for cellular use. At that time the growing clout of the mobile interests will collide with the declining power of the broadcasters, and some spectrum space seems likely to be re-assigned to mobile.

  3. swildstrom Says:

    @Rich Reppelier–The power of the broadcasters will be very hard to break because its source the is reliance of members of Congress on local TV news for free publicity. As long a members depend on the local station having a camera there to see them cut the ribbon on that federally funded bridge, broadcasters will have plenty of clout. Their power has weakened a bit in recent years, but broadcasters remain one of the most powerful lobbies in Washington.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: